| 
            
              It was estimated by the American Cancer Society that there would be 
            161,840 deaths from lung cancer in 2008 (90,810 among men and 71,030 
            among women), accounting for about 29% of all cancer deaths. 
            Additionally, it was estimated by the American Cancer Society that 
            there would be 215,020 new lung cancer cases diagnosed in 2008 
            (114,690 among men and 100,330 among women), accounting for about 
            15% of all cancer diagnoses.  More women die each year from 
            lung cancer than from breast, uterine, and ovarian cancers combined. 
            Every hour of every day, 19 people die from lung cancer and at least 
            15-percent never smoked. Lung cancer is considered a silent killer, 
            since the disease is most often not detected until it is in a 
            terminal stage. (Source: American Cancer Society) Page generated 2012-11-16 at 15:54:55
 Sitemap
              Approximately 90% of all lung cancers occur among smokers and 
              approximately 10% occur among non-smokers. (MLF Note: Some 
              recent research indicates that approximately 8% of men and 20% of 
              women diagnosed with lung cancer were never-smokers--see
              
              High Rates of Lung Cancer Found for Female Non-smokers). 
              Passive smoking contributes to the development of lung cancer 
              among non-smokers and certain occupational exposures such as 
              asbestos exposure are also known to cause lung cancer. (Source: 
              National Cancer Institute)  
              "Although cigarette smoking is the most common cause of lung 
              cancer, other risk factors include industrial exposures to agents 
              such as asbestos, arsenic, uranium, nickel, and chromates as well 
              as exposures to the indoor air pollutants such as formaldehyde and 
              radon gas. There are a significant number of patients who do not 
              have the risk factors outlined above. Lung cancer is not 
                  necessarily a self-inflicted disease by smoking. The incidence 
                  of lung cancer in women without a history of prior smoking has 
                  increased in recent years.   Histologic types of lung 
                  cancer are different between smokers and non-smokers. The 
                  majority of patients with no prior smoking have a histologic 
                  type of adenocarcinoma as opposed to either squamous cell 
                  carcinoma or small cell carcinoma, common in patients with 
                  prior smoking. Estrogens are known to act as tumor promoters 
                  through a receptor-mediated mechanism in reproductive organs. 
                  There are some reports of estrogen receptor expression in lung 
                  cancer, and it is possible that the lung is an 
                  estrogen-responsive organ and that women are more susceptible 
                  to lung cancer than men, suggesting a role for estrogen in the 
                  development of this disease." (Source: 
                  Noah C. Choi, M.D., Distinguished 
                  Scholar in Thoracic Oncology, Director of MGH Thoracic 
                  Oncology Center, Head
                  of Thoracic Oncology Unit,  Massachusetts General 
                  Hospital)   | 
           
            | "How 
            do you discover a lung cancer while it is curable?  Doctors no 
            longer rely nearly as much on routine annual chest X-rays in 
            smokers, because there are better diagnostic techniques. In my own 
            practice, I send everyone at special risk-particularly cigarette 
            smokers, past or present, for a low-dose helical CT scan of the 
            chest every year or two. This scan has detected several small 
            cancers among my patients, who subsequently were cured." (Source: 
            Face The Facts About Lung Cancer, by Dr. Isadore Rosenfeld, Boston 
            Sunday Globe, 11/9/03)   
              "The 
                best hope of curing lung cancer is finding it as early as possible. 
                If you are at risk, this new test (CT scan) can detect tiny spots 
                on your lungs years before they would even be seen on a regular 
                chest x-ray. These tiny spots, or nodules may be signs of early 
                lung cancer." (Source: The New York Early Lung Cancer Action 
                Program)   "Lung 
                cancer results in more deaths in the United States than any other 
                malignancy, and accounts for more cancer deaths than breast, colon, 
                and prostate cancer combined. Lung cancer causes no symptoms in 
                its earliest stages. Moreover, the five-year survival rate for 
                lung cancer is only 14 percent, a number that has not changed 
                significantly in many years. These statistics underscore the dire 
                need for the earliest detection possible. An effective screening 
                technique that detects the cancer in its initial stages may help 
                prevent death in the nearly 170,000 individuals diagnosed with 
                this disease each year." "CT screening transforms the 
                prognosis for lung cancer, just as mammography did for breast 
                cancer and the PAP test did for cervical cancer." "The 
                current five-year survival rate for lung cancer is only 14 percent 
                But that could soar to 80% if all smokers and ex-smokers received 
                annual CT exams and early treatment" (Source: Claudia I. 
                Henschke, M.D., Ph.D., Professor of Radiology and Division Chief 
                of Chest Imaging at the New York Weill Cornell Center of New York 
                Presbyterian Hospital) Spiral 
                computed tomography (CT) of the chest performed in middle-aged 
                smokers can help identify two to four times more lung cancers 
                than chest x-rays, with more than 70 percent of the tumors still 
                in Stage 1, according to an article on lung cancer in the first 
                issue for November (2002) of the American Thoracic Society's peer 
                reviewed journal, the American Journal of Respiratory and Critical 
                Care Medicine. (Source: Intelihealth. com [a subsidiary of Aetna]). The 
                Early Lung Cancer Action Project.  Study population was 
                1,000 symptom-free volunteers of whom 46% were female and 54% 
                were male.  The median age of this study was 67, the median 
                pack years smoking was 47 and asbestos exposure was 14% of cohort.  
                The volunteers were considered medically able to have thoracic 
                surgery.  Both chest x-ray and low-dose CT scan were utilized 
                in the study.  The results of the study were as follows: 
                (1) the low-dose CT scan detected nodules in 233 volunteers; the 
                chest x-ray detected nodules in 68 volunteers.  (2) High 
                Resolution CT scan evaluation of the volunteers in foregoing (1) 
                showed that 27 of the 233 volunteers (2.7%) with CT scan detected 
                nodules had Stage 1 resectable lung cancers, whereas 7 of the 
                68 volunteers (0.7%) with x-ray detected nodules had Stage 1 resectable 
                lung cancers.  Study Conclusion was that low dose spiral 
                CT scan is a useful way to identify early stage lung cancer in 
                populations at high risk for developing lung cancer.  (Source: 
                Lancet, July 10, 1999) Early 
                Lung Cancer Detection and Treatment Strategies. "Lung 
                cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths in both men and women 
                in the United States. The majority of lung cancer patients will 
                present with advanced disease with a very poor overall survival.  
                Although prior screening trials have shown no benefit from screening, 
                there is renewed interest in low-dose CT screening as a screening 
                modality for lung cancer. A high proportion of screen-detected 
                cancers are early stage and resectable for cure. For the majority 
                of these early stage patients, standard lobectomy is the treatment 
                of choice. New options to potentially detect and treat early stage 
                lung cancer will increase dramatically in the future." (Source: 
                Port JL, Kent M, Altorki NK, Surg Oncol. 2002; 11:191-199) 
              In the June 24, 
              2003, Personal Journal section of the Wall Street Journal, Spiral 
              CT Scan for early stage lung cancer detection was listed in an 
              article entitled: "Five Tests Worth Paying For--Health Insurance 
              Usually Won't Cover Them, but They Could Save Your Life"  |